Files
Viper_VRTE/_withcontent.vp
T
TermiNexus a9a53bd117 fix(withcontent): _find_provider 倒序循环上界显式转有符号,避免被无符号化后退化
range(stack.top - 1, -1, -1) 中 stack.top 是 UINT64 字段,上界被推断为无符号时该递减循环的谓词退化为 ugt(-1 在无符号域即 UINT32_MAX) => 条件恒假、循环体不可达、_find_provider 恒返回 NULL,with 的 __mbuddy__ 注入失效(_str.upper 对 NULL 取 vtable 崩溃)

显式 t.CInt 转换使符号域与递减语义一致,与编译器侧 stop 为负字面量时退回有符号谓词的修复互为双保险
2026-09-15 22:45:29 +08:00

80 lines
3.2 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
import t, c
from stdint import *
from w32.win32process import TlsAlloc, TlsGetValue, TlsSetValue
import stdlib
import stdio
import string
# Maximum provider stack depth (compiler verifies sufficiency; increase if needed)
_MAX_PROVIDER_DEPTH: t.CDefine = 32
@t.Object
class _ProviderStack:
"""Provider stack, stores pairs of field names and pointers."""
names: t.CArray[VOIDPTR, 32]
ptrs: t.CArray[VOIDPTR, 32]
top: UINT64
# TLS index (global; all threads share the same index)
_tls_index: ULONG = 0
@t.TLS
def _init_tls():
"""Initialize TLS index (executes once; subsequent calls are skipped)."""
global _tls_index
# 双保险:TPV 已正式实现 @t.TLS(函数级一次性守卫,首次执行后置
# __tls_init_done 标志,后续调用直接返回),此判重守卫保留以兼容
# 尚未重建的旧 TPV.exe。_tls_index 初始为 0(TlsAlloc 成功不会返回 0)。
if _tls_index == 0:
_tls_index = TlsAlloc()
def _get_stack() -> _ProviderStack | t.CPtr:
"""Obtain current thread's provider stack. Allocate one if none exists."""
_init_tls()
stack: _ProviderStack | t.CPtr = TlsGetValue(_tls_index)
if stack == None:
stack = stdlib.malloc(_ProviderStack.__sizeof__())
string.memset(stack, 0, _ProviderStack.__sizeof__())
TlsSetValue(_tls_index, stack)
return stack
def _push_provider(field_name: str, ptr: t.CPtr):
"""Push a provider (field_name, ptr) onto the stack."""
stack: _ProviderStack | t.CPtr = _get_stack()
if stack.top >= _MAX_PROVIDER_DEPTH:
stdio.printf("[with] ERROR: provider stack overflow (depth=%lu, max=%d), field '%s' not injected\n", stack.top, _MAX_PROVIDER_DEPTH, field_name)
return
stack.names[stack.top] = field_name
stack.ptrs[stack.top] = ptr
stack.top = stack.top + 1
def _pop_provider():
"""Pop the top provider entry from the stack."""
stack: _ProviderStack | t.CPtr = _get_stack()
if stack.top > 0:
stack.top = stack.top - 1
def _find_provider(field_name: str) -> t.CPtr:
"""Search for matching field_name starting from stack top.
Return associated pointer, or NULL if no match found."""
stack: _ProviderStack | t.CPtr = _get_stack()
# 上界显式转 t.CInt(有符号):本循环是「递减 + stop 为 -1」形态,若上界
# 被当作无符号(stack.top 是 UINT64 字段),比较谓词会退化为 ugt,而 -1 在
# 无符号域是 UINT32_MAX ⇒ 条件恒假、循环体不可达、本函数恒返回 NULL(with 的
# __mbuddy__ 注入全部失效,_str.upper 对 NULL 取 vtable 崩溃)。显式转换让
# 符号域与递减语义一致,与编译器侧「stop 为负字面量时退回有符号谓词」互为双保险。
for i in range(t.CInt(stack.top) - 1, -1, -1):
# 字段名用 strcmp 内容比较:编译器对每次 create_global_string 生成
# 独立的字符串常量(TPV 不去重),push/find 的指针地址不同,
# 指针 == 永假会导致 provider 匹配失败(__mbuddy__ 注入不上)。
if string.strcmp((str)(stack.names[i]), field_name) == 0:
return stack.ptrs[i]
return None